For example, in a discussion between Catholics and Protestants, there would be no need to defend the premise that Jesus rose from the grave, since both sides accept this claim as fact.
![who wrote somewhere between jesus and john wayne who wrote somewhere between jesus and john wayne](https://www.seekye.life/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/John_Wayne_1940-510x645.jpg)
This does not mean that no premise may be used for which we cannot provide compelling proof that would satisfy everyone. Conversely, the case for the soundness of this argument rests on the evidence supporting the two premises. Again, if the two premises of the argument are both true, then the conclusion must be true. Given the validity of the deductive form of the argument, the only way to challenge the argument rationally (reasonably) is to challenge one or both of the premises. The above argument follows a simple, deductively valid syllogistic form: Premise 2: That Scripture is inerrant is one of the teachings of Jesus Christ.Ĭonclusion: Therefore, that Scripture is inerrant is true. Premise 1: All of the teachings of Jesus Christ are true. I have stated the premises in normal English for ease of reading, but they can be stated more formally to make clear the logical structure of the argument: The form of this argument is such that, if the premises (the assertions of fact on which the argument is based) are true, the conclusion must be true. The above is a logically deductive argument, more specifically a syllogism. Premise 2: Jesus Christ taught that Scripture is inerrant.Ĭonclusion: Therefore, Scripture is inerrant. Premise 1: Whatever Jesus Christ taught is true. In describing the argument for the inerrancy of Scripture as “simple,” I mean that the basic structure of the argument is simple and the premises of the argument easy enough to understand.
![who wrote somewhere between jesus and john wayne who wrote somewhere between jesus and john wayne](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/UHfuWJmFz4M/maxresdefault.jpg)
![who wrote somewhere between jesus and john wayne who wrote somewhere between jesus and john wayne](http://frozenfiefdom.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/P_2_Emails_between_Jack_BeNimble_and_PMR.123133520.jpg)
In short, anyone who believes in Jesus ought to believe Scripture to be inerrant because Jesus viewed Scripture that way. Rather, I offer a simple argument for why anyone who seeks to be a follower of Jesus or who professes to accept Jesus as an authoritative teacher or prophet ought to affirm the inerrancy of Scripture. In this article, I make no attempt to persuade avowed nonbelievers in Jesus of the truth, inspiration, or inerrancy of Scripture. As a general rule, one would not expect persons who do not identify themselves as followers of Jesus to accept the inerrancy of Scripture-the doctrine that Scripture is inspired by God in such a way that it communicates truth without error when properly understood.